#Comprehensive meta analysis input options manual
Es obligatoria una búsqueda manual en la bibliografía de artículos, editoriales, revisiones, etc. La selección de los estudios supone la búsqueda en más de un repertorio en la web. La hipótesis ideal para una revisión sistemática es la generada por el material científico que no formará parte del metaanálisis. Assessment of heterogeneity and publication bias is also illustrated with the same program.Įn esta revisión se detallan los métodos habituales que se aplican en una revisión sistemática con metaanálisis. The most common procedures for combining studies with binary outcomes are described (inverse of variance, Mantel-Haenszel, and Peto), illustrating how they can be done using Stata commands. Such collection also should be carried out by two researchers on an independent basis. Data collection on quality of the selected reports is needed, applying validated scales and including specific questions on the main biases which could have a negative impact upon the research question. The selection of studies should be made by two investigators on an independent basis. A manual search in the references of articles, editorials, reviews, etc. The selection of studies involves searching in web repertories, and more than one should be consulted. The ideal hypothesis for a systematic review should be generated by information not used later in meta-analyses.
In this review the usual methods applied in systematic reviews and meta-analyses are outlined.
0 kommentar(er)
